By Rush Limbaugh:

I think the vast differences in compensation between victims of the September 11 casualty and those who die serving the country in Uniform

are profound. No one is really talking about it either, because you just don't criticize anything having to do with September 11.

Well, I just can't let the numbers pass by because it says something really disturbing about the entitlement mentality of this country.

If you lost a family member in the September 11 attack, you're going to get an average of $1,185,000. The range is a minimum guarantee of $250,000, all the way up to $4.7 million.

If you are a surviving family member of an American soldier killed In action, the first check you get is a $6,000 direct death benefit, half

of which is taxable. Next, you get $1,750 for burial costs. If you are the surviving spouse, you get $833 a month until you remarry.

And there's a payment of $211 per month for each child under 18. When the child hits 18, those payments come to a screeching halt.

Keep in mind that some of the people who are getting an average of $1.185 million up to $4.7 million are complaining that it's not enough. Their deaths were tragic, but for most, they were simply in the wrong place at the wrong time. Soldiers put themselves in harms way FOR ALL OF US, and they and their families know the dangers.

We also learned over the weekend that some of the victims from the Oklahoma City bombing have started an organization asking for the same

deal that the September 11 families are getting. In addition to that, some of the families of those bombed in the embassies are now asking for compensation as well.

You see where this is going, don't you? Folks, this is part and parcel of over 50 years of entitlement politics in this country. It's just really sad.

Every time a pay raise comes up for the military, they usually receive next to nothing of a raise. Now the green machine is in combat in the

Middle East while their families have to survive on food stamps and live in low-rent housing. Make sense?

However, our own U.S. Congress just voted themselves a raise, and many of you don't know that they only have to be in Congress one time to

receive a pension that is more than $15,000 per month, and most are now equal to being millionaires plus. They also do not receive Social Security on retirement because they didn't have to pay into the system.

If some of the military people stay in for 20 years and get out as an E-7, you may receive a pension of $1,000 per month, and the very people who placed you in harm's way receive a pension of $15,000 per month. I would like to see our elected officials pick up a weapon and join ranks before they start cutting out benefits and lowering pay for our sons and daughters who are now fighting.

 

If your interested there is more.......................

This must be a campaign issue in 2004. Keep it going.

SOCIAL SECURITY: (This is worth the read. It's short and to the point.)

Perhaps we are asking the wrong questions during election years. Our Senators and Congressmen do not pay into Social Security. Many years

ago they voted in their own benefit plan. In more recent years, no congressperson has felt the need to change it.

For all practical purposes their plan works like this:

When they retire, they continue to draw the same pay until they die, except it may increase from time to time for cost of living adjustments. For

example, former Senator Byrd and Congressman White and their wives may expect to draw $7,800,000 - that's Seven Million, Eight Hundred Thousand), with their wives drawing $275,000.00 during the last years of their lives.

This is calculated on an average life span for each. Their cost for this excellent plan is $00.00. These little perks they voted for themselves is free to them. You and I pick up the tab for  this plan. The funds for this fine retirement plan come directly from the General Fund--our tax dollars at work! From our own Social Security Plan, which you and I pay (or have paid) into --every payday until we retire (which amount is matched by our employer) --we can expect to get an average $1,000 per month after retirement. Or, in other words, we would have to collect our average of $1,000 monthly benefits for 68 years and one month to equal Senator Bill Bradley's benefits!

Social Security could be very good if only one small change were made. And that change would be to jerk the Golden Fleece Retirement Plan from under the Senators and Congressmen. Put them into the Social Security plan with the rest of us and then watch how fast they would fix it.

 

  

Hi ATLANTAHAPPS.COM,

You have no idea of the exhilaration and anticipation with which I open every e-mail you send. Keep them coming!  Now, to the "perspective" at hand.

 The arguments which Mr.. Limbaugh espouses are bowls of warmed-over swill.  He begins quite correctly that there is great inequity between the benefits the surviving relatives of the victims of "9/11" will ultimately receive and the benefits the survivors of our heroic soldiers will receive.  Surely, no one questions the need that this be corrected--AND FAST!!  But then his arguments veer r-i-g-h-t-w-a-r-d into a morass of slick forgetfulness and mindless convenience.

The names he cites are all Democratic politicians.  Is there no Republican ex-lawmaker who is feeding at the public trough.  Have Republicans not been the majority in both houses of Congress for the past two sessions?  Is there a bill that they've seriously championed that would seek to change this feeding frenzy?  Has the current President been any more vigilant or purposeful in necessary changes.  All one hears is what the Democrats have done "for the past forty years".

The self-avowed forward-looking Republicans seem awfully content to maintain this sorry state of affairs especially when the kiln of Limbaugh brag that the Republican politicians had been so successful in careers BEFORE they became members of Congress.  It appears they would have EVERY innate incentive to campaign vigorously for change.  Instead, with their pockets already stuffed full, they shuffle up to the Federal till and plunder it as those they decry. 

 

WHAT A PERSPECTIVE!! I need to stop here but I hope you got MY perspective.

Gladstone

 

Dear ATLANTAHAPPS.COM

You ought to look these things up before you post them. The entire bit on Social Security and Congressional retirements is a  fabrication of the worst sort. First members of congress pay 8.4% of  their  salary for their retirement.They also pay the same percentage the rest of us do to Social security. The amount they receive is dependent on the number of years service - just  like most company plans.  Somewhere around 20 years, Congressional retirees  will get about 50% of pay. Just like regular Federal employees, and not  much different from most company plans.  Senator Byrd will get a pretty good  chunk, because he's been there forever.  Bradley will get about 61,000 a  year.  Less than half pay.  Not bad, but hardly what your posting alludes  too.

Get your act together.
 
Perry

 

Mr. Perry,

Just like any other media outlet, we check all sources before we post them! We have a legal team as well as other people on our staff that research information on a constant basis. Just like any other media outlet, we put information out to the public and let them make their own decisions, based on the facts. Our job is simply to educate and inform.


Vincent P. McCant
Founder & Publisher

 

ATLANTAHAPPS.COM logo

Please Read Our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy

Powered by: Theotronix  To report technical problems with this Web site, contact us.