|

By Rush Limbaugh:
I think the vast
differences in compensation between victims of the September 11
casualty and those who die serving the country in Uniform
are profound. No
one is really talking about it either, because you just don't
criticize anything having to do with September 11.
Well, I just
can't let the numbers pass by because it says something really
disturbing about the entitlement mentality of this country.
If you lost a
family member in the September 11 attack, you're going to get an
average of $1,185,000. The range is a minimum guarantee of $250,000,
all the way up to $4.7 million.
If you are a
surviving family member of an American soldier killed In action, the
first check you get is a $6,000 direct death benefit, half
of which is
taxable. Next, you get $1,750 for burial costs. If you are the
surviving spouse, you get $833 a month until you remarry.
And there's a
payment of $211 per month for each child under 18. When the child hits
18, those payments come to a screeching halt.
Keep in mind
that some of the people who are getting an average of $1.185 million
up to $4.7 million are complaining that it's not enough. Their deaths
were tragic, but for most, they were simply in the wrong place at the
wrong time. Soldiers put themselves in harms way FOR ALL OF US, and
they and their families know the dangers.
We also learned
over the weekend that some of the victims from the Oklahoma City
bombing have started an organization asking for the same
deal that the
September 11 families are getting. In addition to that, some of the
families of those bombed in the embassies are now asking for
compensation as well.
You see where
this is going, don't you? Folks, this is part and parcel of over 50
years of entitlement politics in this country. It's just really sad.
Every time a pay
raise comes up for the military, they usually receive next to nothing
of a raise. Now the green machine is in combat in the
Middle East
while their families have to survive on food stamps and live in
low-rent housing. Make sense?
However, our own
U.S. Congress just voted themselves a raise, and many of you don't
know that they only have to be in Congress one time to
receive a
pension that is more than $15,000 per month, and most are now equal to
being millionaires plus. They also do not receive Social Security on
retirement because they didn't have to pay into the system.
If some of the
military people stay in for 20 years and get out as an E-7, you may
receive a pension of $1,000 per month, and the very people who placed
you in harm's way receive a pension of $15,000 per month. I would like
to see our elected officials pick up a weapon and join ranks before
they start cutting out benefits and lowering pay for our sons and
daughters who are now fighting.
If your
interested there is more.......................
This
must be a campaign issue in 2004. Keep it going.
SOCIAL
SECURITY: (This is worth the read. It's short and to the point.)
Perhaps we are
asking the wrong questions during election years. Our Senators and
Congressmen do not pay into Social Security. Many years
ago they voted
in their own benefit plan. In more recent years, no congressperson has
felt the need to change it.
For all
practical purposes
their plan works like this:
When they
retire, they continue to draw the same pay until they die, except it
may increase from time to time for cost of living adjustments. For
example, former
Senator Byrd and Congressman White and their wives may expect to draw
$7,800,000 - that's Seven Million, Eight Hundred Thousand), with their
wives drawing $275,000.00 during the last years of their lives.
This is
calculated on an average life span for each. Their cost for this
excellent plan is $00.00. These little perks they voted for themselves
is free to them. You and I pick up the tab for this plan. The funds
for this fine retirement plan come directly from the General Fund--our
tax dollars at work! From our own Social Security Plan, which you and
I pay (or have paid) into --every payday until we retire (which amount
is matched by our employer) --we can expect to get an average $1,000
per month after retirement. Or, in other words, we would have to
collect our average of $1,000 monthly benefits for 68 years and one
month to equal Senator Bill Bradley's benefits!
Social Security
could be very good if only one small change were made. And that change
would be to jerk the Golden Fleece Retirement Plan from under the
Senators and Congressmen. Put them into the Social Security plan with
the rest of us and then watch how fast they would fix it.
Hi
ATLANTAHAPPS.COM,
You have no idea
of the exhilaration and anticipation with which I open every e-mail
you send. Keep them coming! Now, to the "perspective" at hand.
The
arguments which Mr.. Limbaugh espouses are bowls of
warmed-over swill. He begins quite correctly that there is great
inequity between the benefits the surviving relatives of the
victims of "9/11" will ultimately receive and the benefits the
survivors of our heroic soldiers will receive. Surely, no one
questions the need that this be corrected--AND FAST!! But then
his arguments veer r-i-g-h-t-w-a-r-d into a morass of slick
forgetfulness and mindless convenience.
The names he
cites are all Democratic politicians. Is there no Republican
ex-lawmaker who is feeding at the public trough. Have Republicans
not been the majority in both houses of Congress for the past two
sessions? Is there a bill that they've seriously championed that
would seek to change this feeding frenzy? Has the current President
been any more vigilant or purposeful in necessary changes. All one
hears is what the Democrats have done "for the past forty years".
The self-avowed
forward-looking Republicans seem awfully content to maintain this
sorry state of affairs especially when the kiln of Limbaugh brag that
the Republican politicians had been so successful in careers BEFORE
they became members of Congress. It appears they would have EVERY
innate incentive to campaign vigorously for change. Instead, with
their pockets already stuffed full, they shuffle up to the Federal
till and plunder it as those they decry.
WHAT A
PERSPECTIVE!! I need to stop here but I hope you got MY
perspective.
Gladstone
Dear ATLANTAHAPPS.COM
You ought to look these things up before you post them. The entire bit
on Social Security and Congressional retirements is a
fabrication of the worst sort. First members of congress pay 8.4% of
their salary for their retirement.They also pay the same
percentage the rest of us do to Social security. The amount they
receive is dependent on the number of years service - just like
most company plans. Somewhere around 20 years, Congressional
retirees will get about 50% of pay. Just like regular Federal
employees, and not much different from most company plans.
Senator Byrd will get a pretty good chunk, because he's been
there forever. Bradley will get about 61,000 a year.
Less than half pay. Not bad, but hardly what your posting
alludes too.
Get your act together.
Perry
Mr. Perry,
Just like any other media outlet, we check all sources before we post
them! We have a legal team as well as other people on our staff that
research information on a constant basis. Just like any other media
outlet, we put information out to the public and let them make their
own decisions, based on the facts. Our job is simply to educate and
inform.
Vincent P. McCant
Founder & Publisher
|